* copies package.json, package-lock. Node.js is an open-source, cross-platform, back-end JavaScript runtime environment used to build fast and scalable network applications. * Dockerfile creates app/ folder in container, then JavaScript is a functional programming language, functions are fully typed objects that can be. It is a popular tool for almost any kind of project Node.js runs the V8 JavaScript. ![]() Wouldn't it be easier, then, to just keep the node application, including the package files, contained to its own subdirectory (which we can then set to WORKDIR) while reserving the root project folder for the Dockerfile and other container stuff? Related Posts: Node.js Express: Login and Registration example with JWT (using HTTP Headers) Node. Node.js is an open-source and cross-platform JavaScript runtime environment. By passing types we get correctly typed access to the underlying http objects in routes. We pass the relevant typings for our http version used. The following example creates a http server. ![]() I ask because most of the examples I'm seeing - including this one - then go on to copy the package and package-lock files into the working project directory so that Docker can then run npm install. Fastify is shipped with a typings file, but you may need to install types/node, depending on the Node.js version you are using. But if only for my own edification - why do current practices usually put the Dockerfile in the same root directory as the package.json file? So I know that this tech and these practices are years old and there's likely no point to questioning any conventions by now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |